Articles Posted in Records and Collateral Consequences

Sealing Dismissals and CWOFs in Massachusetts: A Practitioner’s Guide
Attorney Joe Serpa

Massachusetts law often permits a person to seal a dismissal, nolle prosequi, or completed continuance without a finding. The correct procedure depends on the exact disposition. Some non-conviction records must be sealed without a discretionary hearing. Other dismissals require a petition to the court. An older record may qualify for administrative sealing through the Commissioner…

Continue reading ›
United States v. Coloian: The Acquitted Defendant Whose Federal Record No Court Could Erase
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | Massachusetts Criminal Defense Since 1995 The question arrives weekly in this office: the case is over, I won, so when does the record disappear? For a Massachusetts case there is a real answer, with statutes and waiting periods and a petition to file. For a…

Continue reading ›
How Massachusetts Judges Decide Sealing and Expungement Petitions
Attorney Joe Serpa

Massachusetts judges do not apply one general fairness test to every sealing and expungement request. A judge decides whether to seal a dismissal or nolle prosequi under M.G.L. c. 276, § 100C. A judge also decides whether to grant a time-based expungement petition after the Commissioner of Probation certifies eligibility and whether to grant a…

Continue reading ›
A Massachusetts Criminal Charge Can End a Visa, Trigger Deportation, or Cancel Work Authorization Before Any Conviction
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | Massachusetts Criminal Defense Since 1995 In 2025 and 2026, the enforcement environment for non-citizens in Massachusetts changed profoundly. Federal immigration enforcement intensified nationally, SEVIS terminations for international students accelerated, and the State Department began revoking visas after criminal arrests far more aggressively. A non-citizen who…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

He's one of the best people I've met. I'm really appreciative of all the help I received. If you have a serious case, he'll work hard to make sure you have the best outcome. I highly recommend him. You will not be disappointed.

A.J

Mr. Serpa was very helpful with my family member ‘s case. He was able to get it dismissed quickly and easily. He is very professional and very good at what he does. I’m so glad he hired him. You will be glad too if you hire him.

Z.M.

Serpa law office was my attorney of choice for 2 seperate cases I had last year. With both situations, Joseph not only treated me great, delivered the results I was hoping for, and was extremely professional and genuine. I would definitely recommend this law office to anyone in need of legal help.

P.C.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Individual, Hands-On Approach
  2. 2 Winning Trial Record
  3. 3 Criminal Defense Since 1995
Fill out the contact form or call us at 617.936.0201 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

We Accept the Following Payment Solutions

Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

The Lindsay Clancy Trial: A Cruel and Tone Deaf Prosecution

A prosecutor decides not only what to prove but how to speak about the person sitting at the defense table. In the trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Commonwealth told the jury in its opening statement and again in closing that she was a murderer who coldly wanted to see her own children dead. It called…

The Lindsay Clancy Jury Dispute: When Massachusetts Law Permits Removal of a Deliberating Juror

Massachusetts law does not permit a trial judge to remove a deliberating juror merely because the other eleven jurors believe that person is wrong. Once deliberations begin, the judge may discharge a juror only after a hearing establishes an emergency, another compelling reason, or a demonstrated inability to perform the duties of a juror. Disagreement…

Filming Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy Trial and Massachusetts Witness Intimidation Law

An arrest after the alleged filming of jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial raises separate questions under the witness-intimidation, evidence-tampering, contempt, and wiretap laws. This analysis applies each rule without presuming the allegations are true.