Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

Massachusetts Criminal Law: Statutes, Procedure, and Defense in the District Courts and Boston Municipal Court


Attorney Joe Serpa has defended criminal cases in the Massachusetts District Courts and Boston Municipal Court since 1995. These posts cover Massachusetts criminal law as it is practiced. Mr. Serpa explains statutes, case law, court-by-court procedure, and how charges are defended and resolved. These pages are written for defendants, licensed professionals, students, tradespeople, and non-citizens who need to understand what a Massachusetts criminal charge means and what the defense options are.

Proving Who Sent Anonymous Emails in a Massachusetts Stalking Case: Commonwealth v. Hayes
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center October 16, 2026 On September 24, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court upheld the convictions of a man who pursued a woman he met in high school for about fifteen years, violated the harassment prevention order she obtained against him, and threatened her family in emails sent…

Continue reading ›
When Police May Frisk a Person for a Gun in Massachusetts: Commonwealth v. Vihaan V.
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center October 16, 2026 On September 30, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ordered the dismissal of gun charges against a juvenile whom Boston police had frisked after a 911 call reporting “three guys with guns” in a Dorchester backyard. The police ordered the juvenile out of a…

Continue reading ›
Voluntary Intoxication and Consent After the Cornell Case: The New York Rule and the Massachusetts Rule
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center This post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It is based on published court decisions, the text of the statutes, public statements by New York officials, and news reporting. The Cornell allegations have not been proved in any court. The case…

Continue reading ›
How the Men of Cornell University Failed Jane Doe: The Cornell Fraternity Rape Case Under New York and Massachusetts Law
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center This post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It is based on the civil complaint, public statements by Cornell University and New York officials, and published news reporting, including reporting on documents from Cornell’s Title IX investigation. The complaint’s allegations have…

Continue reading ›
Lindsay Clancy Hearing on September 29, 2026 and the Retrial Question
Attorney Joe Serpa

Judge William Sullivan held a hearing on the morning of September 29, 2026, in Plymouth Superior Court in the murder case against Lindsay Clancy. The hearing was the first since Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. Judge Sullivan set arguments on the defense motion to dismiss for November 2. The Plymouth County…

Continue reading ›
Confrontation Rights and Harmless Error in a Family or Household Member Assault Case: Commonwealth v. Khadgi
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center September 28, 2026 Shortly before 2 A.M., a Cambridge police officer walking through Harvard Square saw Shyam Khadgi striking a woman in the face and arms. The officer saw Khadgi strike her ten to fifteen times, hard enough to lift his own foot off the ground.…

Continue reading ›
Vehicle Impoundment and Inventory Searches in Massachusetts: The Appeals Court Decision in Commonwealth v. Beechman
Attorney Joe Serpa

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center September 28, 2026 At about 1 A.M. on September 2, 2024, Boston police officers on patrol in Dorchester saw that the registration on an Acura sport utility vehicle had expired. The officers confirmed through their database that the registration was expired and non-renewable, activated their lights,…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

He's one of the best people I've met. I'm really appreciative of all the help I received. If you have a serious case, he'll work hard to make sure you have the best outcome. I highly recommend him. You will not be disappointed.

A.J

Mr. Serpa was very helpful with my family member ‘s case. He was able to get it dismissed quickly and easily. He is very professional and very good at what he does. I’m so glad he hired him. You will be glad too if you hire him.

Z.M.

Serpa law office was my attorney of choice for 2 seperate cases I had last year. With both situations, Joseph not only treated me great, delivered the results I was hoping for, and was extremely professional and genuine. I would definitely recommend this law office to anyone in need of legal help.

P.C.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Individual, Hands-On Approach
  2. 2 Winning Trial Record
  3. 3 Criminal Defense Since 1995
Fill out the contact form or call us at 617.936.0201 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

We Accept the Following Payment Solutions

Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

Proving Who Sent Anonymous Emails in a Massachusetts Stalking Case: Commonwealth v. Hayes

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center October 16, 2026 On September 24, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court upheld the convictions of a man who pursued a woman he met in high school for about fifteen years, violated the harassment prevention order she obtained against him, and threatened her family in emails sent…

When Police May Frisk a Person for a Gun in Massachusetts: Commonwealth v. Vihaan V.

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center October 16, 2026 On September 30, 2026, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ordered the dismissal of gun charges against a juvenile whom Boston police had frisked after a 911 call reporting “three guys with guns” in a Dorchester backyard. The police ordered the juvenile out of a…

Can a Vacated Restraining Order or Harassment Prevention Order Be Expunged From Your Massachusetts Record?

The SJC held in Piper P. v. Barron B. that a judge can expunge a vacated harassment prevention order from the statewide registry only for fraud on the court.