Articles Posted in Trial Practice and Evidence

A Practitioner’s Guide to Correcting a Massachusetts Criminal Sentence: Rule 29, Rule 30(a), and the Limits of Finality
Serpa Law Office

A Massachusetts criminal sentence is not as final as it looks on the day it is imposed, and not as open to revision as clients hope. Three instruments govern what can change afterward: Mass. R. Crim. P. 29, which permits revision or revocation of a disposition within a sixty-day limit; Mass. R. Crim. P. 30(a),…

Continue reading ›
A Practitioner’s Guide to Sentencing in the Massachusetts District Court and Boston Municipal Court
Serpa Law Office

Most criminal cases in Massachusetts are resolved in the District Court and the Boston Municipal Court, and most of them end at a disposition rather than a verdict. The hearing is often short, the session is busy, and choices with years of consequences are made in minutes. This guide is written for defense lawyers. It…

Continue reading ›
A Practitioner’s Guide to Trial Motion Practice in Massachusetts Criminal Cases
Serpa Law Office

Three decisions recur in nearly every Massachusetts criminal trial: which evidence to challenge before the jury hears it, when to object once the testimony begins, and how to attack the sufficiency of the Commonwealth’s proof. Each decision has a settled legal framework, and each carries preservation consequences that fix the standard of review on appeal.…

Continue reading ›
A Practitioner’s Guide to Opening Statements and Closing Arguments in Massachusetts Criminal Trials
Serpa Law Office

In a Massachusetts criminal trial, counsel address the jury twice without a witness on the stand: in the opening statement before any evidence is offered, and in the closing argument after both sides rest. Different rules govern the two moments. An opening is a preview, confined to what counsel reasonably expects the evidence to show.…

Continue reading ›
A Practitioner’s Guide to Jury Selection in Massachusetts Criminal Trials
Serpa Law Office

Jury selection in a Massachusetts criminal trial is governed by G. L. c. 234A, by Rule 20 of the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure, and by Supreme Judicial Court decisions that have changed substantially over the past decade. Counsel who last selected a Superior Court jury before 2015 will find the questioning transformed: attorneys now…

Continue reading ›
A Practitioner’s Guide to Bail and the Dangerousness Hearing in Massachusetts
Serpa Law Office

Few decisions in a Massachusetts criminal case come faster, or matter more, than the custody decision at the first appearance. Two bodies of law govern it. Bail under G. L. c. 276, §§ 57 and 58 concerns a single question: what will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance in court. Pretrial detention on grounds of public…

Continue reading ›
A Practitioner’s Guide to the Continuance Without a Finding and Its Collateral Consequences
Serpa Law Office

The continuance without a finding is central to District Court and Boston Municipal Court practice. Under G. L. c. 278, § 18, a defendant admits that the Commonwealth’s evidence would support a finding of guilty, the court declines to enter that finding, and the case is continued on conditions to a specific date, at which…

Continue reading ›
Cross-Examining an Absent Accuser: Excited Utterances, Spontaneous Utterances, and Section 806 in a Massachusetts Domestic Violence Trial
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense Some of the hardest fought Massachusetts domestic violence cases I try are the ones where the accuser never takes the stand. The person who called 911 recants, refuses to appear, or has reconciled and wants the case gone. The Commonwealth…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

He's one of the best people I've met. I'm really appreciative of all the help I received. If you have a serious case, he'll work hard to make sure you have the best outcome. I highly recommend him. You will not be disappointed.

A.J

Mr. Serpa was very helpful with my family member ‘s case. He was able to get it dismissed quickly and easily. He is very professional and very good at what he does. I’m so glad he hired him. You will be glad too if you hire him.

Z.M.

Serpa law office was my attorney of choice for 2 seperate cases I had last year. With both situations, Joseph not only treated me great, delivered the results I was hoping for, and was extremely professional and genuine. I would definitely recommend this law office to anyone in need of legal help.

P.C.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Individual, Hands-On Approach
  2. 2 Winning Trial Record
  3. 3 30 Years Experience
Fill out the contact form or call us at 617.936.0201 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

We Accept the Following Payment Solutions

Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

A Practitioner’s Guide to Correcting a Massachusetts Criminal Sentence: Rule 29, Rule 30(a), and the Limits of Finality

A Massachusetts criminal sentence is not as final as it looks on the day it is imposed, and not as open to revision as clients hope. Three instruments govern what can change afterward: Mass. R. Crim. P. 29, which permits revision or revocation of a disposition within a sixty-day limit; Mass. R. Crim. P. 30(a),…

A Practitioner’s Guide to Sentencing in the Massachusetts District Court and Boston Municipal Court

Most criminal cases in Massachusetts are resolved in the District Court and the Boston Municipal Court, and most of them end at a disposition rather than a verdict. The hearing is often short, the session is busy, and choices with years of consequences are made in minutes. This guide is written for defense lawyers. It…

The Hardship License After a Massachusetts OUI

A Massachusetts OUI suspension rarely has to mean the loss of a job. The statutes allow a hardship license, limited to an identical 12 hour period each day, for most drivers who resolve their cases, and the timing depends entirely on how the suspension arose. This page sets out the rules the statutes fix and…