Articles Posted in Massachusetts Criminal Law Updates | Serpa Law Office

Forensic Drug Evidence in Massachusetts: Substitute Analysts and Confrontation
Serpa Law Office

In Commonwealth v. Gordon (2025), applying Smith v. Arizona, the Supreme Judicial Court held that a substitute analyst may not testify to an opinion that depends on the truth of an absent analyst\u2019s testimonial statements. Here is what that means for forensic proof in drug cases.

Continue reading ›
Massachusetts Gun Licensing After Bruen: Nonresidents and Travelers
Serpa Law Office

Bruen did not end Massachusetts firearm licensing. In 2025 the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the current resident and nonresident licensing schemes and confirmed that unlicensed carrying remains a crime. Here is what visitors, travelers, and new residents need to know.

Continue reading ›
Commonwealth v. Grimaldi: The SJC Allows Checkpoint Bodycam Recordings of Field Sobriety Tests
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense On June 2, 2026, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Commonwealth v. Grimaldi, SJC-13842, and answered a question that Massachusetts sobriety checkpoint cases have raised since troopers began wearing body cameras: can the Commonwealth use bodycam recordings of a driver’s field…

Continue reading ›
Commonwealth v. Watson: Postconviction Digital Forensic Analysis of Cell Phones Under G. L. c. 278A
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense On July 9, 2026, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Commonwealth v. Watson, SJC-13850 (July 9, 2026), and held that G. L. c. 278A, the postconviction forensic and scientific analysis statute, permits digital forensic analysis of cell phones. The Commonwealth had…

Continue reading ›
Commonwealth v. Arias: The SJC’s New Limit on Delayed Traffic Stops
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense On April 15, 2026, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Commonwealth v. Arias, SJC-13816, and gave Massachusetts a rule it did not have before: when police stop a car for a traffic violation they observed earlier, the elapsed time between the…

Continue reading ›
Gravito v. Commonwealth: Every Defendant Keeps Full Access to Their Own Sealed Records
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense On November 25, 2025, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Gravito v. Commonwealth, and the rule it announced belongs to every Massachusetts defendant with a sealed record. Sealing closes your file to employers, landlords, and the public. It never closes your…

Continue reading ›
The SJC’s Chhieng Decision: A Defective Immigration Warning Can Reopen an Old Massachusetts Case
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense On May 7, 2026, the Supreme Judicial Court decided Commonwealth v. Chhieng, and it matters to every noncitizen who ever resolved a Massachusetts criminal case with a plea or an admission. The court held that the immigration warning many District…

Continue reading ›
AI Evidence and Deepfakes in Massachusetts Criminal Cases: Authentication, Daubert-Lanigan, and the Defense Playbook
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense Artificial intelligence has entered Massachusetts criminal courtrooms from two directions at once. Digital evidence offered against a defendant, a screenshot, a voice recording, a video, can now be fabricated with consumer software, which puts authenticity in play in cases where…

Continue reading ›
Massachusetts Firearms Deadlines in October 2026: Serialization, Registration, and How to Avoid a Criminal Charge
Serpa Law Office

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center | 30 Years Massachusetts Criminal Defense Massachusetts firearms owners face two separate compliance deadlines in October 2026, and much of the confusion in circulation comes from running them together. Under 501 CMR 20.00, the regulation implementing M.G.L. c. 140, § 121C, every firearm, frame, or receiver…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

He's one of the best people I've met. I'm really appreciative of all the help I received. If you have a serious case, he'll work hard to make sure you have the best outcome. I highly recommend him. You will not be disappointed.

A.J

Mr. Serpa was very helpful with my family member ‘s case. He was able to get it dismissed quickly and easily. He is very professional and very good at what he does. I’m so glad he hired him. You will be glad too if you hire him.

Z.M.

Serpa law office was my attorney of choice for 2 seperate cases I had last year. With both situations, Joseph not only treated me great, delivered the results I was hoping for, and was extremely professional and genuine. I would definitely recommend this law office to anyone in need of legal help.

P.C.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Individual, Hands-On Approach
  2. 2 Winning Trial Record
  3. 3 30 Years Experience
Fill out the contact form or call us at 617.936.0201 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

We Accept the Following Payment Solutions

Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

Adjutant Evidence and Rebuttal in Massachusetts Self-Defense Cases

Learn when Massachusetts courts may admit Adjutant first-aggressor evidence, what notice Rule 14.3 requires, and how the prosecution may respond.

Massachusetts Question 9: What the 2026 Firearms Referendum Changes Before Election Day, and What It Does Not

Chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024 is in force now and was never suspended by the referendum petition. The October 2026 compliance deadlines fall before the November 3 vote.

Can a 258E Harassment Prevention Order Require Firearm Surrender in Massachusetts?

A Massachusetts harassment prevention order under chapter 258E can suspend a firearms license and require surrender of every firearm the defendant owns, with no family relationship and no criminal charge.