Woburn District Court Criminal Defense Attorney

A person arrested or summoned to court in Woburn, Burlington, Winchester, Wilmington, Stoneham, Reading, or North Reading faces a criminal case in the Woburn District Court, at 30 Pleasant Street in Woburn. A person who receives a notice of a clerk-magistrate hearing from this court faces an application for a criminal complaint, not a criminal charge. The clerk-magistrate decides at that hearing whether a criminal complaint issues.

The judge arraigns an arrested or summoned defendant on the first court date and decides whether to release the defendant on personal recognizance, set bail, or hold the defendant. This page describes the courthouse, the towns it serves, the clerk-magistrate hearing, the arraignment, and the charges that commonly come before this court.

The Woburn District Court sits at 30 Pleasant Street, Woburn, MA 01801, in downtown Woburn near the interchange of Interstate 93 and Interstate 95 (Route 128). The courthouse is open Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

The main courthouse number, (781) 935-4000, reaches the clerk’s office and the probation department. The criminal clerk’s office answers at extension 235. The clerk’s office fax is (781) 933-4404, and the probation department fax is (781) 932-2593. The clerk’s office email address is cmwoburndc@jud.state.ma.us.

The courthouse offers free public parking. MBTA bus routes 134 and 354 serve Woburn. Winchester Center Station on the MBTA Lowell commuter rail line is the closest train stop. From the station, a taxi or a rideshare completes the trip to the courthouse.

Attorney Joe Serpa has practiced Massachusetts criminal defense since 1995. He represents clients in the Woburn District Court at clerk-magistrate hearings, arraignments, motion hearings, and trials.

A criminal case in this court can end in a dismissal, a continuance without a finding, a plea, or a trial. The firm’s page on how criminal cases get dismissed in Massachusetts explains each way a Massachusetts criminal case ends in a dismissal, from the clerk-magistrate hearing through trial.

Jurisdiction

Woburn District Court serves Woburn, Burlington, Winchester, Wilmington, Stoneham, Reading, and North Reading, all in Middlesex County. The police departments of those seven communities bring their arrests and complaint applications to this court. The State Police also bring cases here from the stretches of Interstate 93, Interstate 95 (Route 128), and Route 3 that pass through these towns.

A Woburn judge hears every misdemeanor except libel, every felony punishable by no more than five years in state prison, and the more serious felonies listed in G.L. c. 218, § 26. The judge may impose up to two and one-half years in the house of correction on a single charge, but may not sentence a defendant to state prison. G.L. c. 218, § 27. A defendant who chooses a jury trial in Woburn is tried before a jury of six. G.L. c. 218, § 26A.

The court also hears applications for 209A restraining orders and 258E harassment prevention orders filed by people who live in these communities. The court hears the criminal charge when the police allege that a person violated one of those orders.

The Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office prosecutes the criminal cases in Woburn District Court. Assistant district attorneys assigned to this courthouse appear at arraignments, pretrial hearings, motion hearings, and trials. The Commonwealth prosecutes a felony beyond the District Court’s final jurisdiction in the Middlesex Superior Court, after a grand jury returns an indictment.

The Clerk-Magistrate Hearing

A person accused of a misdemeanor who was not arrested has the right to a clerk-magistrate hearing before any criminal complaint issues. G.L. c. 218, § 35A. The court mails the accused person a notice of the hearing date.

A person accused of a felony has the same right when the police officer who applied for the complaint requests a hearing. For other felony applications, the clerk-magistrate decides whether to hold a hearing. The clerk-magistrate may issue the complaint without a hearing when there is an imminent threat of bodily injury, of the commission of a crime, or of flight from Massachusetts.

The hearing is usually closed to the public. The clerk-magistrate, the police officer or private citizen who applied for the complaint, the accused person, and counsel attend. The applicant needs to show only probable cause to believe that the accused person committed the offense. A clerk-magistrate may decline to issue a complaint even when the application shows probable cause, as long as the district attorney’s office has not told the clerk-magistrate that it intends to prosecute. Victory Distributors, Inc. v. Ayer Div. of the Dist. Court Dep’t, 435 Mass. 136, 142 to 143 (2001).

In Attorney Serpa’s experience, the clerk-magistrates at Woburn consider the accused person’s background, the circumstances of the incident, and any restitution already paid. They also consider the consequences a complaint would have for the person’s job, professional license, or immigration status.

No complaint issues when the clerk-magistrate denies the application. No arraignment occurs, and no entry appears on the person’s CORI from that application. The police report remains in the police department’s own files. The clerk-magistrate may also continue the application for several months and dismiss it at the end of that period. A dismissal at the end of a continuance also ends the application without a complaint.

A complaint issues when the clerk-magistrate finds probable cause and decides to issue the complaint. The court then schedules an arraignment. From the arraignment forward, the case is a public criminal case.

Woburn’s clerk-magistrate hearings cover a wide range of accusations. Burlington Mall shoplifting cases, neighbor and family disputes from Winchester and Stoneham, criminal motor vehicle citations, and first-offense drug possession cases commonly begin with a hearing notice rather than an arrest. The firm’s clerk-magistrate hearing page explains how Attorney Serpa prepares for the hearing. The firm’s post on what to do when a show cause notice arrives explains the first steps after the notice comes in the mail.

Arraignment and Release

The police book a person arrested in one of these towns at the local station and bring the person to Woburn District Court for arraignment on the next court day. A person who was not arrested, but against whom a complaint has issued, receives a summons with the arraignment date.

At the arraignment the clerk reads the charge and the defendant pleads not guilty. The judge then releases the defendant on personal recognizance, admits the defendant to bail under G.L. c. 276, § 58, or imposes conditions of release, such as an order to stay away from and have no contact with the complaining witness.

The judge may also order the defendant held without bail as dangerous after a hearing under G.L. c. 276, § 58A. The Commonwealth must move for that hearing. Section 58A applies to listed offenses, such as a domestic assault or a felony that involves physical force.

The arraignment creates an entry on the defendant’s criminal record, the CORI. A later dismissal does not remove that entry. A defendant whose case ends in a dismissal, a nolle prosequi, or a dismissed continuance without a finding may ask the court to seal the record under G.L. c. 276, § 100C, with no waiting period. Commonwealth v. Pon, 469 Mass. 296 (2014).

The Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office receives the case at the arraignment. From that point the assistant district attorney decides whether the Commonwealth prosecutes the complaint, whether to enter a nolle prosequi, what position to state on bail, and what plea to offer. The firm’s arraignment page and bail page explain each of those decisions.

Common Charges at Woburn District Court

OUI (G.L. c. 90, § 24)

In Attorney Serpa’s experience, many OUI cases at Woburn District Court begin with a State Police stop on Interstate 93 or Interstate 95 (Route 128), and many others begin with a local police stop in one of the seven towns.

A driver convicted of a first OUI faces up to two and one-half years in a house of correction, a fine of $500 to $5,000, or both. The Registry of Motor Vehicles (RMV) revokes the driver’s license for one year after a first conviction. The convicted driver may apply to the RMV for a hardship license for work or school after three months.

A first offender may resolve the case under G.L. c. 90, § 24D. A driver whose only prior OUI is 10 years or more old may also use § 24D, once in a lifetime. The judge places the driver on probation for up to two years, usually with a continuance without a finding, and assigns the driver to the driver alcohol education program.

The RMV suspends the driver’s license for 45 to 90 days, or for 210 days when the driver was under 21 at the time of the offense. The driver may apply to the RMV for a hardship license as soon as the driver enters the program.

A driver age 21 or older with no prior OUI conviction who refuses the breath test loses the license for 180 days. The RMV imposes that suspension before a judge or jury decides whether the driver is guilty. The Commonwealth may not use the refusal as evidence at the OUI trial. G.L. c. 90, § 24(1)(e).

The defense in an OUI case examines the reason for the stop and the exit order. The defense also examines the roadside field sobriety tests, which are the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk and turn, and the one leg stand. The breath test raises its own questions, including the fifteen-minute observation period and the foundation for the result on the Alcotest 9510. The firm’s OUI defense page describes each of those defenses.

In Attorney Serpa’s experience, the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office does not reduce an OUI charge to negligent operation in exchange for a plea. A first-offense OUI case at Woburn usually ends with the driver accepting the § 24D program, with a trial, or with a dismissal after a successful motion.

Domestic Violence (G.L. c. 265, § 13M and § 13A)

A domestic violence case at Woburn District Court usually begins with an arrest. The 209A restraining order statute makes arrest the preferred police response when an officer has probable cause to believe that a person committed a misdemeanor involving abuse and no protective order is in effect. G.L. c. 209A, § 6. The police hold the arrested person at the station and bring the person to court for arraignment.

Assault and battery on a family or household member under G.L. c. 265, § 13M applies to spouses and former spouses, people who have a child together, and people who are or were in a substantive dating or engagement relationship. A defendant convicted under § 13M faces up to two and one-half years in a house of correction, a fine of up to $5,000, or both.

The Commonwealth charges an assault and battery on a roommate, a sibling, or another household member outside those relationships under the general assault and battery statute, G.L. c. 265, § 13A.

At the arraignment the judge may order the defendant, as a condition of release, to stay away from and have no contact with the complaining witness. A stay-away condition can keep the defendant out of a shared home until the case ends or a judge changes the condition.

In Attorney Serpa’s experience, the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office proceeds with a domestic assault case even when the complaining witness asks the prosecutor to drop the charge. The prosecutor relies on the police officers’ observations, the 911 recording, photographs, and medical records. The firm’s page on what happens when the alleged victim will not testify explains the limits on that evidence.

Federal law prohibits a person convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence from possessing a firearm or ammunition. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). A nurse, a teacher, or another licensed professional may also have to report the conviction to a licensing board, depending on the board’s rules.

A 209A restraining order is a separate civil order. The complaining witness applies for the order. A judge may issue a temporary order without the defendant present. The court then holds a hearing within ten court business days, at which the defendant may appear and the judge decides whether to extend the order. G.L. c. 209A, § 4.

The judge who issues the order must also order the defendant to surrender all firearms, ammunition, and any license to carry or firearm identification card when the plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of immediate danger of abuse. G.L. c. 209A, § 3B.

The firm’s pages on domestic violence defense and on a person falsely accused of domestic violence, and the domestic violence arrest FAQs, cover the arrest, the arraignment, and the defenses in detail.

209A Restraining Order and 258E Harassment Prevention Order Violations (G.L. c. 209A, § 7 and G.L. c. 258E, § 9)

The police must arrest a person they have probable cause to believe violated a 209A restraining order. G.L. c. 209A, § 6. A person convicted of violating a 209A restraining order or a 258E harassment prevention order faces up to two and one-half years in a house of correction, a fine of up to $5,000, or both. G.L. c. 209A, § 7, and G.L. c. 258E, § 9.

The Commonwealth must prove four things beyond a reasonable doubt to convict. A court issued the order. The order was in effect on the date of the alleged violation. The defendant knew the terms of the order. The defendant violated the order. Commonwealth v. Delaney, 425 Mass. 587 (1997). Knowledge of the order is the only mental state the Commonwealth must prove. The Commonwealth does not have to prove that the defendant intended to violate the order.

Only a judge can change or end the order. A defendant who answers the plaintiff’s call, replies to the plaintiff’s text message, or accepts the plaintiff’s invitation to meet still violates a no-contact order.

A defendant on release in a pending case who is arrested for a new offense faces a bail revocation hearing under G.L. c. 276, § 58. The judge may revoke the defendant’s release on the earlier case and hold the defendant without bail for up to 60 days. The judge must first find probable cause for the new offense and find that the defendant’s release would seriously endanger another person or the community.

The judge must order a defendant convicted of violating a 209A restraining order to complete a certified batterer’s intervention program. G.L. c. 209A, § 7. The judge may excuse the program only for good cause shown, in specific written findings, or when the program finds the defendant unsuitable.

The firm’s pages on violation of a 209A restraining order, criminal violation of a 258E harassment prevention order, and the FAQs on 209A restraining order and 258E harassment prevention order violations explain the defenses to these charges.

Drug Offenses (G.L. c. 94C)

State Police drug cases in this court often begin with a traffic stop on Interstate 93 or Interstate 95 and a search of the car. The charges are possession under G.L. c. 94C, § 34, possession with intent to distribute under G.L. c. 94C, §§ 32 to 32D, or trafficking under § 32E, depending on the drug and the quantity.

Simple possession under § 34 is a misdemeanor for a first offense. A person convicted of possessing most controlled substances faces up to one year in jail, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. A person convicted of a first offense of possessing heroin faces up to two years in a house of correction, a fine of up to $2,000, or both.

The judge may place a first offender charged with possession on probation or continue the case without a finding. The judge may then dismiss the case and seal the record at the end of the probation period. G.L. c. 94C, § 34.

Distribution and trafficking charges are felonies. A trafficking case begins in Woburn District Court and usually proceeds to the Middlesex Superior Court by indictment. The District Court cannot try a trafficking charge. G.L. c. 218, § 26.

The school zone statute, G.L. c. 94C, § 32J, adds a mandatory minimum of two years to a distribution or trafficking offense. The statute applies to an offense committed within 300 feet of a school between 5:00 a.m. and midnight, or within 100 feet of a public park or playground.

The Legislature narrowed the statute in 2018. The Commonwealth must also prove that the defendant used violence or threats, possessed a firearm during the offense, directed another person who committed a drug felony, or distributed to a person under 18 or induced a minor to commit a drug offense under § 32F or § 32K.

The defense in a highway drug case examines the reason for the stop, the exit order, the search of the car, the chain of custody of the drugs, and the laboratory analysis. The firm’s drug crimes page and its page on possession and distribution charges describe those defenses.

Motor Vehicle Offenses (G.L. c. 90C, § 3)

A criminal motor vehicle charge, such as negligent operation, leaving the scene of an accident, or operating after suspension, often begins with a criminal citation rather than an arrest. The officer hands the driver the citation at the scene or mails it afterward. A driver accused of a misdemeanor on the citation has four days from the violation to request a clerk-magistrate hearing in writing from the clerk-magistrate of Woburn District Court. G.L. c. 90C, § 3(B)(2).

The statute requires a hearing only when the driver makes a timely written request. The firm’s post on the criminal citation and the four-day deadline explains how to make the request.

Shoplifting and Larceny (G.L. c. 266, § 30A and § 30)

In Attorney Serpa’s experience, Burlington Mall and the stores along the Middlesex Turnpike and Route 128 in Burlington generate many of the shoplifting cases at Woburn District Court. Store security detains the suspected shoplifter and calls the police. The officer may arrest the person without a warrant on the store employee’s statement. G.L. c. 266, § 30A. The officer may instead apply for a complaint, and the case then begins with a clerk-magistrate hearing notice.

A person convicted of a first shoplifting offense involving goods worth less than $250 faces a fine of up to $250. A second offense involving goods worth less than $250 carries a fine of $100 to $500. A third or later offense carries a fine of up to $500, up to two years in jail, or both. G.L. c. 266, § 30A.

A person convicted of shoplifting goods worth $250 or more faces a fine of up to $1,000, up to two and one-half years in a house of correction, or both. The Commonwealth may instead charge larceny under G.L. c. 266, § 30.

Larceny of property worth more than $1,200 is a felony. A defendant convicted of that felony faces up to five years in state prison, or a fine of up to $25,000 and up to two years in jail. Larceny of property worth $1,200 or less is a misdemeanor. A defendant convicted of that misdemeanor faces up to one year in jail or a fine of up to $1,500.

A shoplifting or larceny conviction appears on the person’s CORI. Many employers, licensing boards, and security clearance investigators treat theft as a crime of dishonesty. A shoplifting case that begins with an application for a complaint goes to a clerk-magistrate hearing first. The clerk-magistrate may decline to issue the complaint, for example when the accused person has no record and has repaid the store. The firm’s pages on shoplifting and larceny defense and on the shoplifting clerk-magistrate hearing explain the hearing and the defenses.

Firearms (G.L. c. 269, § 10 and G.L. c. 140, §§ 121B and 121C)

A person convicted of carrying a firearm without a license to carry, G.L. c. 269, § 10(a), faces two and one-half to five years in state prison or 18 months to two and one-half years in a house of correction. The judge must impose a sentence of at least 18 months. The statute forbids a suspended sentence, a continuance without a finding, and probation or parole before the defendant has served 18 months.

The 2024 firearms law, An Act Modernizing Firearm Laws, St. 2024, c. 135, requires a serial number on every firearm. G.L. c. 140, § 121C. The law also requires owners to register their firearms with the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services. G.L. c. 140, § 121B.

An Executive Office of Public Safety and Security regulation required the owner of a firearm without a valid serial number to serialize it by October 2, 2026, unless an exemption applies. 501 CMR 20.08(1). The Executive Office’s published guidance sets October 28, 2026 as the deadline to register firearms already owned.

The firm’s post on the October 2026 firearms registration deadline explains the penalties for a firearm that was never registered or serialized. The firm’s firearms defense page covers the other firearms charges this court hears, including possession of a firearm without an FID card and improper storage.

Winchester and Stoneham Cases

The Winchester and Stoneham police departments bring their domestic assault arrests and motor vehicle cases to Woburn District Court. Residents of both towns file their 209A restraining order and 258E harassment prevention order applications here as well.

Many of the people accused in these cases hold a professional license or a security clearance. For a nurse, a teacher, a financial professional, or a federal contractor, the clerk-magistrate hearing allows counsel to address the accusation before a public criminal case begins and before any entry appears on the person’s CORI. Attorney Serpa prepares the hearing around the specific consequence the client faces, such as a licensing board’s reporting question or a clearance form, because the answer to that question often depends on whether a complaint ever issued.

Immigration Consequences

Federal immigration law imposes its own consequences on a conviction or a continuance without a finding in the Woburn District Court. A noncitizen whose Woburn case ends without a conviction may still have to answer questions about the arrest on an immigration application or at an interview. An immigration lawyer should review the exact question, the client’s immigration status, and the Woburn court record before the client files the application or attends the interview.

The firm’s guide to Woburn District Court, Burlington Mall shoplifting, and interchange OUI cases describes who appears in this courthouse and how the clerk-magistrates and the judges handle these cases.

Contact Serpa Law Office at 617.936.0201 for a free consultation. The Boston office is at 20 Park Plaza, Suite 400A. The Quincy office is at 500 Victory Road, Suite 400A.

Client Reviews

He's one of the best people I've met. I'm really appreciative of all the help I received. If you have a serious case, he'll work hard to make sure you have the best outcome. I highly recommend him. You will not be disappointed.

A.J

Mr. Serpa was very helpful with my family member ‘s case. He was able to get it dismissed quickly and easily. He is very professional and very good at what he does. I’m so glad he hired him. You will be glad too if you hire him.

Z.M.

Serpa law office was my attorney of choice for 2 seperate cases I had last year. With both situations, Joseph not only treated me great, delivered the results I was hoping for, and was extremely professional and genuine. I would definitely recommend this law office to anyone in need of legal help.

P.C.

Greater Boston Criminal Law Alerts

Voluntary Intoxication and Consent After the Cornell Case: The New York Rule and the Massachusetts Rule

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center This post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It is based on published court decisions, the text of the statutes, public statements by New York officials, and news reporting. The Cornell allegations have not been proved in any court. The case…

How the Men of Cornell University Failed Jane Doe: The Cornell Fraternity Rape Case Under New York and Massachusetts Law

By Attorney Joe Serpa | Georgetown University Law Center This post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. It is based on the civil complaint, public statements by Cornell University and New York officials, and published news reporting, including reporting on documents from Cornell’s Title IX investigation. The complaint’s allegations have…

Lindsay Clancy Hearing on September 29, 2026 and the Retrial Question

Judge William Sullivan held a hearing on the morning of September 29, 2026, in Plymouth Superior Court in the murder case against Lindsay Clancy. The hearing was the first since Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. Judge Sullivan set arguments on the defense motion to dismiss for November 2. The Plymouth County…

Contact Us

  1. 1 Individual, Hands-On Approach
  2. 2 Winning Trial Record
  3. 3 Criminal Defense Since 1995
Fill out the contact form or call us at 617.936.0201 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message

We Accept the Following Payment Solutions